|
GOLD ANALYSIS |
|
PLATINUM GROUP METALS |
|
INDUSTRIAL METALS |
|
WHAT'S NEW |
|
GOLD NEWS |
|
DIAMONDS & GEMS |
|
POLITICAL ECONOMY |
|
JUNIOR MINING |
|
MINING FINANCE |
GFMS Executive Chairman Philip Klapwijk reckons that fundamentals for both gold and silver are extremely negative, although he concedes that current government policies might prolong the bull markets a little further.
Author: Lawrence WilliamsNEW YORK -
Despite the New York Hard Assets convention normally being a haven for gold bugs, the first keynote speaker on the first day was not particularly taken with the near term prospects for precious metals. The convention floor, though, was largely dominated by gold and silver miners who obviously feel otherwise, as do many of the newsletter writers attending the event.
The keynote speaker Philip Klapwijk, Executive Chairman of GFMS, offered a highly analytical presentation covering gold and silver that almost grudgingly conceded that despite highly adverse fundamentals, gold could still rise a little over the remainder of the year, but not by as much as many analysts believe because fundamentals are currently so adverse.
Silver's fundamentals were also seen as sufficiently poor to keep prices back, despite its traditional volatility which has tended to see it outperforming gold on the way up, and underperforming on the way down.
Klapwijk's address was titled 'Is it game over for gold and silver, or has the bull market in these metals still got legs?' As noted above his feelings on gold were mixed, but purely on fundamental grounds, which have put supply into a substantial surplus, largely through a plunge in jewellery fabrication demand coupled with an inordinate amount of scrap coming on to the market.
He suggested the current supply/demand balance should not support even the current gold price. The fact that the gold price is as high as it is is thus down to investment demand, but if the stock market in general continues to climb, making people less risk averse, then money could start flowing out of investment gold (where the appetite seems already to be waning) back into general equities.
Klapwijk painted an even gloomier picture on silver with rising mine supply and falling industrial demand moving the market to a substantial surplus. But, he pointed out--while investment demand for gold has reached nearly one-third of the offtake as much of the world sees gold as money-- investment demand for silver lags far behind with only the diehards seeing silver as a monetary metal nowadays.
Perhaps in favour of price rises, though, short term interest rates are at or near zero, government budget deficits are exploding and monetary supply growth is extremely rapid and inflation is likely to pick up strongly at some stage.
Under normal circumstances, Klapwijk averred, we might have already seen peaks in price for both gold and silver, but central bank and governmental policies could prolong the bull market a little longer, but the adverse fundamentals will bring prices down eventually.
Other points in favour of precious metals price rises could be that Central Banks are moving back to a stage where they seem to have less appetite for the selling off gold reserves; some are even beginning to buy which could continue to support gold, despite the adverse basic fundamentals. Even so, he would not predict more than an $1100 peak for gold and a return to $20 silver as possible medium term high points for the metals.
In a Q and A session, in response to a question as to whether he would debate Bill Murphy of GATA on the latter's view that there is a global banking conspiracy to keep the gold price down, Klapwijk replied with a very definite "NO!" He quoted Margaret Thatcher on the IRA in that he would not wish to give the GATA views the publicity that such a debate might generate.
This strong statement was greeted with a round of applause from the audience, perhaps demonstrating that the New York Hard Assets conference is not quite such a venue for gold bugs after all.
Follow mining news updates on Twitter http://twitter.com/Mineweb
SUBSCRIBE to Mineweb.com's free daily newsletter now.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE |
Disclaimer
MINEWEB is an interactive publication, with rolling deadlines through each day, commencing in the Sydney morning, and concluding, 24 hours later, in the Vancouver evening. If you believe your side of an issue deserves inclusion, but has failed to meet one of our deadlines, you are invited to notify the Editor in Chief in Johannesburg, and we will include you in our editing and expanding on our stories. Email him at alechogg@gmail.com
|
responses to this article
|
|
philip klaptrap... Actually, I think it's the other way around. I don't think Bill Murphy of GATA should honor this lackie for the central banker anti-gold cartel with the time of day, let alone waste his breath with someone with Klaptrap's agenda. I . .more by jt on May 12 2009, 03:46 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Phillip Klapwijk Lawrence Williams is an astute observer. The last paragraph of this article says it all. Phillip Klapwijk is not working in support of the mining industry. Nicely written article. by bill m on May 12 2009, 04:14 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Phillip Klapwijk Aaaaa. If "Bloody Maggie" was still Prime Minister Northern Ireland would not be free. by Pat O'Halloran on May 12 2009, 04:38 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
MARKETS......... These markets will continue DOWN, and where will investors put their money as this market continues down. Obviously into something no one has control over, Gold and Silver especially. This is a disgrace, the handing out of 'scrip' to the people who . .more by j. campone on May 12 2009, 06:08 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
China oops... does China know that Sir Klapwijk has decreed that their 400 tonne purchase was all for nought? Better sell the shiny yellow stuff and get lots of luverly T bills paying 2 per cent. by Lod Max on May 12 2009, 07:03 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
klapklap usually gold goes up when one of these talks...let's see... by ben on May 12 2009, 07:50 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Adverse fundamentals? It's easy to weave words like "adverse fundamentals" into a speech. But someone should ask this gentleman to specify and enumerate what exactly those "adverse fundamentals" for silver are supposed to be? If he can name a few, let's say three, he may . .more by Peter R on May 12 2009, 07:58 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Silver has Adverse Fundamentals at $20 - WTF? If even this nay sayer reckons $20 silver is possible with adverse fundamentals when only a few months back you could buy silver for $10/oz - all I can say to that is "bring it on baby, shower my silver backed IRA with buckets loads of adversity!" by GH on May 12 2009, 08:30 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
klapklap Paid fanatics in the history of the world have existed from the time of Adam and Eve. So has the law of supply and demand. Klapklap's hard assets seem to be softer than cotton. by factandveritas on May 12 2009, 08:42 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Don't be too hard on Phillip Don't be too hard on Phillip. He is only saying what he's been told to say. He is not bright enough to know the difference between hard assets and crinkly toilet paper. Fred25 by Fred25 on May 12 2009, 11:40 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Th..e Bank for International Settlement reports in 2 weeks time You can expect them to tell you exactly what sort of mess the worlds economic system is in.The unserviceable paper ie fiat currencies and bonds that are busy destroying our financial system will weigh in favour of buying gold as will the derivative . .more by RUS on May 12 2009, 23:40 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
ECB Well, probably they do not have much more left of the ammunition to keep the gold-silver price down. In March -April to stop the price rise, the European central Bank was dumping by 10 tonnes of physical gold on the market - toatl 50 . .more by fred26 on May 13 2009, 05:23 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
I have a different take on the IRA/GATA comment... I was in the audience and I have a very different take on the IRA/GATA comment... I personally was applauding "the suggestion of the debate" and not his answer. by riskjunkie on May 13 2009, 06:11 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Liars and thiefs F*** Philip Klapwijk and Nandler, Do they suck each others C***? How does that affect market sentiment? by Joe on May 14 2009, 00:21 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
liars and theifs That chickenshit Nandler or Klapwijk doesn't have the balls to debate Bill Murphy of the Gold Anti Trust Action Committee as I believe they are market manipulating degenerate paid off jack wacks. They are the jesters of disinformation. I would love . .more by Joe on May 14 2009, 00:30 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Wow.... I had no idea that there were so many people of this caliber punting gold. Why is there so much emotion attached to this metal? There is so much gold in the ETF coffers ( we hope) that when the computers get a whiff that the price is going down they . .more by and Zen on May 14 2009, 02:34 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
and Zen, couldn't agree with you more If gold drops, then a massive selloff will occur, since at least 50% of gold demand is ETF driven. The big emphasis is IF gold drops, and also, what point will constitute the trigger. THe USD is tanking, and gold is not rising. So if this doesn't do . .more by Jack on May 14 2009, 05:43 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |
|
Extremely Negative Fundamental for gold/silver Mr. Klapwijk, I believe your address was only half titled correctly. " Is it game over for gold/silver?" Your address should have been; " Is it game over for the markets and those who may have conspired to suppress gold/silver prices?" Neither . .more by Dal on May 24 2009, 23:03 Find this comment inappropriate? Report it |